Judgements & News

Posted: 2019/03/09

Ontario Court of Justice


Her Majesty the Queen, and

P. V. (a.k.a. M. V. P.) [2014] O.J.

No. 1412 2014 ONCJ 138

Halton Court File No. 1365/12

Ontario Court of Justice

L.M. Baldwin J.

Heard: March 27, May 24, June 13 and 25, 2013. Judgment: March 20, 2014.

[Summary by Quicklaw {Lexis Nexis}] Trial of accused for two counts of assault. The complainant gave a videotaped K.G.B. statement under oath in which she told police she and the accused had been arguing about his son a lot, and on this occasion, the accused told her their relationship was over and she should leave. The complainant stated she left but came back the next morning and resumed the argument. The complainant stated the accused was drinking rum and coke and started pushing her, and then pushed her to the floor and strangled her until she hit him in the face and ran. The complainant stated the accused found her car keys for her and she went outside, but was too upset to drive, so called the police and called a friend. The complainant made several physical demonstrations of the alleged assault and stated there was an earlier argument during which the accused punched her in the face and his brother had to intervene. The officer noted some redness on the complainant’s collarbone, which she attributed to the accused. In the 9-11 call, the complainant said the accused choked her, threw her to the ground and slapped her, and had been drinking. The complainant told the dispatcher the fight was about the accused’s son and the accused had punched her two weeks prior. When the officer arrived on the scene, the complainant was in the driveway crying and had some redness on her chest and neck. The accused had some blood on his nose and the smell of alcohol on his breath. The accused was arrested for assault. The complainant’s friend testified that, when she arrived, the complainant was hysterical and was crying and asking why the accused was being arrested. The complainant gave her statement at the police station. The complainant later recanted her statement and denied all allegations at trial. The complainant testified she had been in two prior car accidents and was in poor health and memory and one at least seven different medications. The complainant denied the veracity of her statements to 9-11 and claimed she was forced to make the police statement. The complainant testified her chest and neck became red when she was upset. The accused denied all allegations.


The Supreme Court of Canada describes ours as “a liberal and enlightened system of pre-trial release under which an accused must normally be granted bail”. In principle, most accused can and should be released on bail. In practice, having an experienced lawyer in bail court can make the difference between bail and jail... 

read more

An experienced criminal defence lawyer ensures that clients gain a true sense of confidence about how the system works, what can be done, and what will happen in court. The lawyer’s role is to give the client a practical grasp of the situation so that the client can instruct the lawyer with confidence. The lawyer’s job is to give the client a voice where the client would otherwise be ill-equipped to express and defend themselves...

read more

If you are convicted of driving while Impaired, ‘Over 80’, Refusing Breath Sample or Dangerous Operation, the Judge has no choice but to impose minimum penalties, including a mandatory license suspension. When your license is later reinstated, your insurance rates go off the dial. Your only chance to completely avoid that is to go to trial with an experienced criminal lawyer...

read more

‘Zero-tolerance’ became the touchstone of Domestic Violence enforcement many years ago, and it now seems to be so with alleged sex crimes. ‘Zero-tolerance’ does not comprehend the presumption of innocence. It prevents police and crowns from exercising discretion to weed out bad cases...

read more

If you have been searched or had property seized by police or other state agents, you may have been the victim of illegal conduct and that may be evidence that a Judge will allow the Crown to use against you. Sections 8, 9, 10 and 24 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms may provide you with a complete defence...

read more

Let an expert handle it.

Call GTC Law
705 499 7644


Call GTC Law
705 499 7644


Servicing Clients In...

  • North Bay
  • Sudbury
  • Haileybury
  • Parry Sound
  • Bracebridge
  • Timmins
  • Kapuskasing
  • Cochrane
  • Barrie
  • Midland



1 416 981 7780


Do not send confidential information or details about your case by email. Do not forward any documents to us. We will not review such information nor can we provide advice until we have accepted you as a client.

Please note that any email correspondence to contact the firm is informational only. You will not be considered a client of the firm until we have agreed to act for you in accordance with our usual policies for accepting clients. The content of this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

Copyright © Graham Clark Professional Corporation 2024. All rights reserved.

Site by Parade